A new wave of agentic AI tools is hitting software stocks where it hurts: per-seat economics.
Investors are pricing a scenario where companies don't need 1,000 SaaS licenses if a handful of AI agents can handle the workflows, and the market is reacting fast.
The iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF
What Lit The Fuse
Anthropic's Claude Cowork plugins launched last week with a focus on automating clerical knowledge work across legal, analytics, and administrative functions.
That's exactly the kind of work that drives enterprise seat counts at major SaaS vendors.
The reaction was swift.
Software names sold off broadly, with investors questioning whether traditional per-user pricing models can survive if AI handles the workflows.
The Data Layer Gets Hit Next
Once the software interface gets cheaper, the market asks an uglier question: why keep paying terminal-like margins for curated data?
The selling bled into cash-cow data names like S&P Global Inc
Wolters Kluwer NV
Polymarket Says Google's Odds Nearly Tripled
While software and data vendors absorb the shock, prediction markets are placing bets on who owns the end state: the companies with compute, models, and distribution.
Polymarket's market on the largest company by market cap at the end of March shows Alphabet
NVIDIA
The reason is vertical integration.
Alphabet controls the model layer with Gemini, distribution through search and YouTube and Android, and cloud infrastructure.
That gives the company multiple ways to monetize the AI shift.
If AI agents compress SaaS margins, the spend doesn't disappear.
It likely migrates toward the firms that own the compute and the pipes.
Polymarket is treating this as a power shift trade: horizontal SaaS gets pressured, and the hyperscalers absorb the budget.
